Spotlight

Report:

The Forrester Wave™: AIOps Platforms, Q2 2025

How does Forrester define the AIOps Platforms market in 2025?

AIOps is a mature but still transforming market that helps tech leaders and professionals gain deep and contextual insights about their IT estate. It goes beyond system observability and vertical insights to provide horizontal, contextually rooted insights that include the vertical. AIOps platforms vary in approach and focus of capabilities across different areas of solution delivery. When selecting an AIOps platform, tech leaders must consider the platform's enablement of technology reduction, utilization by a wide variety of personas, and expansion of existing investments. Large-scale enterprises should seek to eliminate duplicate or redundant technologies to offset the cost of a new AIOps platform.

Key Facts for The Forrester Wave™: AIOps Platforms, Q2 2025 in 2025

How did the AIOps Platforms market evolve in 2025?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the AIOps Platforms space?

No common features specified.

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Offering Strengths — Relative Weighting

Strategy Strength — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers the evaluation of 10 major AIOps platform vendors, analyzing their current offerings, strategy, and customer feedback. The evaluation focuses on native telemetry access, persona-based insights delivery, and implementation approaches (additive versus discrete). It examines capabilities across data discovery, governance, service mapping, visualization, monitoring, AI/ML features, automation, and collaboration.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by tech leaders and IT professionals who are evaluating AIOps platform purchases and need to understand how vendors compare across key capabilities. It's particularly valuable for organizations seeking to reduce technology sprawl, improve IT operations efficiency, enable diverse personas to consume operational insights, and decide between implementing new platforms versus expanding existing investments. Decision-makers can use this to match vendor strengths with their specific requirements around native telemetry, persona support, and implementation strategy.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: To be included in this evaluation, vendors must have: (1) At least $25 million in annual revenue from AIOps platform products in the last four quarters; (2) Deployment options via on-premises, hosted, and private SaaS; (3) A standalone offering with significant native, out-of-the-box coverage of technology domains for data collection and visibility across the IT ecosystem, with extensive native third-party integration capabilities not requiring custom development; and (4) Significant mindshare among Forrester's enterprise clients as evidenced by frequent mentions in inquiries, advisories, and consulting engagements, and recognition as a competitor by other vendors.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Insufficient revenue (less than $25 million annually from AIOps platform products)
  • Limited deployment options (not supporting on-premises, hosted, and private SaaS)
  • Not a standalone product (data pipeline, application-centric observability tool, or portfolio of products)
  • Insufficient native OOTB coverage of technology domains
  • Lack of extensive native third-party integration capabilities
  • Insufficient mindshare among Forrester enterprise clients
  • Not frequently mentioned by clients or competitors in the market

Q: What should buyers consider when evaluating products in this market?

A:

  • The criticality of native data/telemetry access for real-time data shaping and reducing IT complexity
  • The ability to tailor insights to diverse personas with varying technical capabilities
  • The benefits of an additive versus discrete implementation approach relative to existing investments
  • Whether the platform enables technology reduction and elimination of duplicate tools
  • Support for wide variety of personas beyond highly technical users
  • Integration capabilities with existing IT infrastructure and tools
  • AI/ML capabilities for proactive issue detection and automated remediation
  • Vendor's long-term vision and roadmap alignment with organizational needs

Q: How has the AIOps Platforms market evolved in 2025?

A:

  • Native telemetry access is critical for eliminating failure points and reducing technology sprawl
  • Platforms must tailor insights to diverse personas with varying technical expertise
  • Organizations are evaluating additive versus discrete implementation approaches
  • AI and machine learning are central to anomaly detection, event correlation, and automated remediation
  • Convergence of APM, monitoring, observability, ITSM, ITOM, and security on unified platforms
  • Shift from reactive IT management to proactive, autonomous operations
  • GenAI and agentic AI are transforming operations with purpose-built AI agents
  • Focus on operational resilience and exceptional customer experiences

Q: What differentiates Strength of Offering vs. Strength of Strategy?

A: Strength of Offering (vertical axis) evaluates the current capabilities and features of each vendor's AIOps platform, including technical capabilities across data management, monitoring, AI/ML features, and automation. It focuses on what the product can do today. Strength of Strategy (horizontal axis) evaluates the vendor's future direction and market approach, including vision, innovation, roadmap, partner ecosystem, customer adoption rates, and pricing models. It focuses on the vendor's ability to execute and evolve their offering over time.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements