The Forrester Wave™: Experience Research Platforms, Q1 2026

Experience Research Platforms Vendor Product Comparisons 2026

Key features and pros and cons of top Experience Research Platforms products:

Discuss - Leaders

Pros:

Strong live interview features offering seamless experiences for participants, moderators, and observers
Superior AI features including AI assistant and AI-moderated interviews that support end-to-end research process
Makes global research and analysis efficient and impactful
Superior commitment to delivering roadmap and integrating more AI features

Cons:

Lacking some features in usability studies
Must ensure seamless interaction between qualitative and quantitative approaches following Voxco merger
Need to protect core strength in qualitative research as platform expands

UserTesting - Leaders

Pros:

Best-in-class capabilities for unmoderated usability studies
Exceptional panel quality and recruitment speed
Flexibility enables customers to conduct many types of research including field studies
Leverages AI for study guidance and analysis

Cons:

Lacks some key features for live interviews and longitudinal studies
Does not offer AI-powered research methods yet
Platform usability is an area for improvement
Cost prevents some customers from using it more broadly and is a key factor leading them to consider alternatives
Has introduced new capabilities at a relatively slow pace

Alida - Strong Performers

Pros:

Robust, flexible platform helps teams blend quantitative and qualitative methods
Strong community management features with continuous profiling capabilities
Figma integration and video feedback capabilities provide flexibility for collecting UX feedback
Customers appreciate partnership, responsiveness and willingness to solve problems

Cons:

Below par for usability studies
Must ensure platform remains coherent and user friendly while expanding capabilities and AI-powered features
Opportunities to improve AI for more granular analysis

Dscout - Strong Performers

Pros:

Strong in field and longitudinal studies enabling deep insights collection
Provides core features for usability studies and seamless Figma integration
Uses AI to guide study creation and analysis
AI-powered follow-up questions improve participant response quality
Quality of proprietary panel (Scouts)
Ability to manually select participants

Cons:

Does not offer AI moderators
Customers expect improvements in live interview and UX research capabilities
Want more effective methods for tracking participation
Some customers call for more pricing flexibility with included services

Qualtrics - Strong Performers

Pros:

Strong participant management capabilities
Supports external recruitment through third-party panels and customer-provided participants
Customers appreciate platform's survey capabilities and flexibility
Shows commitment to delivering innovative features in roadmap
Maintains balanced approach letting customers decide how much to use AI

Cons:

Lacks key features required for on-par score in usability studies and interviews
Pricing is flexible but hard to navigate compared with others
Opportunities for improvement in synthetic responses, platform usability, and panel recruitment
Only one reference customer responded to Forrester's outreach

Maze - Contenders

Pros:

Collaborative, user-friendly research platform
AI assistant helps improve research clarity and reduce bias, useful for nonresearchers
Offers AI-moderated interviews to help scale research globally
Intentional about protecting ease of use as new features are added
Track record of delivering innovative features fast

Cons:

Panel recruitment experience not well integrated enough for on-par score
Customers point to limitations in reaching target audience within platform's panel
Governance challenges including need for greater control over platform usage and more robust approval flows
Did not share detailed roadmap
Partner ecosystem not as established as some other vendors

Recollective - Contenders

Pros:

Easy to use different question types (quant and qual) in same study
Conduct longitudinal research with option to schedule activities in advance
Platform's guardrails and adjustable permissions enable access control
Easy for multiple teams and stakeholders to use platform and manage multiple communities
Customers strongly appreciate vendor's partnership and openness

Cons:

Chat-based AI moderator for interviews is helpful but limited in functionality compared to others
Vision is customer-centric but less compelling compared with others evaluated
Relatively slow to deliver innovative features
Did not share detailed roadmap
Opportunities for more streamlined integrations and simplified data export

Userlytics - Contenders

Pros:

Participant panel provides quick access to global audience
Strong usability testing features
Flexibility makes it easy to mix different question types for moderated and unmoderated studies
Customers value relationship with vendor, noting vendor is very supportive and attentive to needs
Flexible pricing supports organizations at different maturity levels

Cons:

Vision is customer-centric but less compelling compared with others evaluated
Introduces new capabilities at relatively slow pace
AI primarily used for analysis; future enhancements will require balancing expectations for advanced AI tools with improving fundamentals like platform usability
Platform supports live interviews with individuals, but group interviews require additional vendor support
Opportunities to improve platform usability including look and feel
Customers expect more AI capabilities beyond insight summarization

FAQs

Q: Which vendors are Leaders in 2026?

A: Discuss, UserTesting

Q: What does "Leader" mean in Forrester Wave terms?

A: Leaders in The Forrester Wave for Experience Research Platforms are vendors that demonstrate strong current offerings and strategy. They excel in providing comprehensive research capabilities, show commitment to innovation (particularly in AI), maintain high customer satisfaction, and have clear vision for meeting the evolving needs of cross-functional research teams. Leaders typically offer best-in-class features in key research methods, have superior panel quality or community management, and demonstrate ability to serve enterprise-scale organizations with mature research practices.

Q: How do I interpret a Forrester Wave?

A: https://www.forrester.com/policies/forrester-wave-methodology/

Report:

Top Vendor Products for Experience Research Platforms in 2026

Experience Research Platforms Vendor Product Comparisons 2026

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

Pros:

Cons:

FAQs

Q: Which vendors are Leaders in 2026?

Q: What does "Leader" mean in Forrester Wave terms?

Q: How do I interpret a Forrester Wave?

Reference