Spotlight

Report:

The Forrester Wave™: Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms, Q4 2025

How does Forrester define the Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms market in 2025?

Learning platforms facilitate the development of new skills for critical business use cases. While early iterations were primarily used to deliver and report on compliance training, the market has matured significantly over the past decade. Learning platforms now play an essential role in supporting organizational learning needs. Two primary forces drive innovation: business leaders demanding the ability to connect learning to business outcomes, and the use of generative AI significantly enhancing content creation and learning curation capabilities. The evaluation identifies Leaders, Strong Performers, and Contenders among 11 key providers based on current offering strength, strategy strength, and customer feedback.

Key Facts for The Forrester Wave™: Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms, Q4 2025 in 2025

How did the Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms market evolve in 2025?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms space?

No common features specified.

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Offering Strengths — Relative Weighting

Strategy Strength — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers an evaluation of the 11 most significant learning management system (LMS) and learning experience platform (LXP) providers in the market. It analyzes their current offerings, strategies, and customer feedback across multiple criteria including deployment strategy, accessibility, content management, analytics, integration capabilities, AI features, learner experience, and support for various use cases from compliance training to extended enterprise learning.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by organizations evaluating learning platform vendors to support their organizational learning needs. It is particularly valuable for buyers seeking to: understand how vendors stack up against each other; identify providers that offer strong genAI capabilities with appropriate safeguards; find solutions that integrate deeply with business applications and HR technology ecosystems; and select platforms that natively support multiple use cases including employee development, partner training, customer education, and deskless worker support. The interactive provider comparison tool allows buyers to adapt findings based on their specific priorities.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors included in this evaluation must provide broad enterprise-level support with all core LMS/LXP functions natively available and a demonstrated track record supporting large enterprises. The solution must be available as a standalone product with its own SKU and pricing, not just as a free feature within a larger portfolio. Vendors must have at least $60 million USD in annual revenue from their learning management system and experience platform product in the last four quarters. Additionally, vendors must have significant mindshare among Forrester's enterprise clients, frequently mentioned in inquiries, advisories, and consulting engagements, and be recognized by other vendors as competitors in the market.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Insufficient corporate market presence (e.g., Anthology's Blackboard, primarily focused on K-16 education sector)
  • Below the $60 million USD annual revenue threshold (e.g., LearnUpon)
  • Primary focus on niche markets rather than broader corporate market (e.g., Meridian Knowledge Solutions focusing on federal and state government)
  • Lack of enterprise-level capabilities or track record
  • Solution not available as standalone product with own SKU and pricing
  • Insufficient mindshare among Forrester's enterprise clients
  • Not recognized as a competitor by other vendors in the evaluation

Q: What should buyers consider when evaluating products in this market?

A:

  • Provide tools to navigate the risks and rewards of genAI, including safeguards to avoid plagiarism, bias, and other risks while leveraging AI for content creation, curation, personalization, and administration
  • Deeply integrate with business applications beyond HR tools, including CRM platforms, marketing automation tools, and business intelligence solutions to connect learning to business outcomes
  • Natively support a variety of use cases extending beyond traditional HR applications to avoid procurement rationalization while ensuring capabilities are sufficiently robust to support complex scenarios
  • Evaluate vendor positioning (Leaders, Strong Performers, Contenders) and adapt findings based on your organization's specific priorities
  • Consider customer feedback indicators, with particular attention to Customer Favorites (double halo) and above-average performers (single halo)
  • Assess the vendor's strategy including vision, innovation pace, roadmap transparency, partner ecosystem strength, and community support options

Q: How has the Learning Management Systems And Experience Platforms market evolved in 2025?

A:

  • GenAI has tremendous potential to create efficiencies and improve the quality of learning content, with many vendors integrating genAI into authoring tools and using AI for curation, personalization, and administration
  • Business leaders are demanding the ability to connect learning to business outcomes, requiring robust integration with CRM platforms, marketing automation tools, and broader business applications
  • Organizations need vendors that understand and support a variety of nuanced use cases extending beyond traditional HR applications
  • The number of use cases for learning is ever expanding, making organizations wary of supporting and integrating different platforms for each purpose
  • Deep integration with business intelligence solutions is essential to facilitate the use of learning data as a driver of insights to the entire organization

Q: What differentiates Strength of Offering vs. Strength of Strategy?

A: Strength of Offering (vertical axis) evaluates the current capabilities and features of each vendor's learning platform, including technical functionality, user experience, integration capabilities, and support for various use cases. It represents what the platform can do today. Strength of Strategy (horizontal axis) evaluates the vendor's future direction and market positioning, including their vision for the market, innovation capacity, product roadmap, partner ecosystem, customer adoption strategies, pricing approach, and community building. It represents where the vendor is headed and how they plan to support customers over time.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements