Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing

How does Gartner define the Application Security Testing market in 2023?

Gartner defines the application security testing (AST) market as the buyers and sellers of products and services designed to analyze and test applications for security vulnerabilities. This market is highly dynamic and continues to experience rapid evolution in response to changing application architectures and enabling technologies. The market comprises tools offering core testing capabilities (static, dynamic and interactive testing; software composition analysis) and various optional, specialized capabilities. AST tools are offered either as software-as-a-service (SaaS)-based subscription offerings, or less often, as on-premises software.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing in 2023

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Application Security Testing market evolved in 2023?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Application Security Testing space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers the Application Security Testing (AST) market, which includes buyers and sellers of products and services designed to analyze and test applications for security vulnerabilities. The research evaluates vendors offering core AST capabilities (SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA) and optional specialized capabilities (API testing, ASPM, container security, developer enablement, fuzzing, IaC testing, mobile AST, and software supply chain security). The Magic Quadrant focuses on transformational technologies delivering on future needs of end users, with emphasis on emerging technologies and approaches, as well as AST tools that address new requirements from modern application architectures, cloud-native development, and DevSecOps initiatives.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: Security and risk management leaders should use this research to evaluate and select AST vendors that can help them meet tighter deadlines and test more complex applications by integrating and automating AST in the software life cycle. This research is particularly valuable for organizations looking to support enterprise DevSecOps and cloud-native application initiatives, those seeking to rationalize their application security investments, and teams wanting to better integrate security practices into development workflows. Development leaders can use this research to find tools that provide high-assurance, high-value findings while fitting into the development process at earlier stages with increasing levels of automation.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors must offer both Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) as core capabilities. SAST must analyze application source, bytecode or binary code for security vulnerabilities during the programming/testing phases. SCA must identify open-source and commercial components and scan for known vulnerabilities, out-of-date libraries, and license issues. For SAST, vendors must support common development languages like Python, Java, C#, PHP, and JavaScript. The offering must focus primarily on security testing with templates for OWASP Top Ten and other vulnerability standards, and provide developer support for vulnerability remediation.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Insufficient revenue (below $100M annually or below $35M with insufficient geographic diversity)
  • Low Market Momentum ranking (not in top 20, or not in top 10 for vendors with $20M+ revenue)
  • Missing mandatory AST capabilities (SAST and/or SCA)
  • Lack of English language support for contracts, documentation, or customer support
  • Primary focus on consulting/managed services rather than AST tools
  • Product not generally available as of December 31, 2022
  • Does not deliver tools as on-premises software, cloud-based appliance, or SaaS

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute focuses on the vendor's current market performance and operational capabilities. It evaluates their existing products/services, financial viability, sales effectiveness, market responsiveness, marketing execution, and customer experience. This axis measures how well vendors are currently delivering value and executing in the market today. Completeness of Vision, in contrast, focuses on the vendor's strategic direction and future positioning. It evaluates their understanding of market trends, strategic planning for products and go-to-market approaches, innovation capabilities, and geographic expansion strategies. This axis measures how well vendors are positioned to meet future market needs and drive market evolution. Essentially, Ability to Execute is about present performance while Completeness of Vision is about future strategic positioning.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements