Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Contract Life Cycle Management

How does Gartner define the Contract Life Cycle Management market in 2024?

Gartner defines contract life cycle management (CLM) market as a solution that proactively manages contracts from initiation through negotiation, execution, compliance and renewal. In this context, a contract is any agreement or contractual document containing rights and obligations that affect an organization now or in the future (e.g., a nondisclosure agreement). CLM solutions allow organizations to create, negotiate and store contracts in a centralized repository. Using these solutions helps mitigate organizational risk by enabling regulatory and policy compliance, providing governance over what is signed and with whom, and role-based access to terms and obligations with third parties. CLM solutions drive visibility, consistency and efficiency in the contracting process across an enterprise. Use cases are primarily aligned to parts of the process, such as presignature and postsignature. Different departments often prioritize a certain use case based on their involvement in the contracting process.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Contract Life Cycle Management in 2024

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Contract Life Cycle Management market evolved in 2024?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Contract Life Cycle Management space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers the Contract Life Cycle Management (CLM) market, evaluating 18 vendors across the Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players quadrants. It assesses vendors based on their Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision, analyzing product capabilities, market understanding, innovation (particularly AI), customer experience, sales execution, geographic and vertical strategies, and overall viability. The research defines CLM as solutions that proactively manage contracts from initiation through negotiation, execution, compliance and renewal, supporting all contract types across legal, procurement, sales and other departments.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by procurement technology leaders and other stakeholders responsible for selecting and implementing enterprise CLM solutions. It helps organizations understand the vendor landscape, evaluate vendors against their specific requirements, and make informed decisions about CLM investments. The research is particularly valuable for organizations looking to digitize their contract life cycle management processes, improve efficiency and compliance, and leverage AI capabilities. It supports both organizations replacing legacy solutions with advanced requirements and those starting their CLM journey at various maturity levels.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors must provide capabilities that enable users to: request a contract, create a contract, manage the negotiation and approval workflow, store contracts, search contracts, report on contracts (including metadata, obligation and compliance management), and update or renew a contract. These features represent the core functionality required to manage all phases of the contract life cycle.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Having fewer than 200 CLM customers live on a single solution
  • Less than 15% of customers with annual revenue of $1 billion or greater
  • Less than $12 million in CLM software revenue in 2023
  • Fewer than 35 new customer logos in 2023
  • CLM product not available for stand-alone purchase
  • Solution not positioned for all types of contracts
  • User base does not include sales, legal and procurement users
  • Product cannot manage all phases of contract life cycle

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute assesses a vendor's current performance through products, services, viability and customer experience, focusing on their ability to keep promises and achieve success. It emphasizes product capabilities (High weighting) and customer experience (High weighting), along with medium weightings for viability, sales execution, operations, and marketing execution. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors' ability to understand current and future market trends, customer needs, and competitive forces. It prioritizes market understanding (High weighting) and innovation (High weighting) as the most important aspects for continuing to deliver value as customer requirements grow, with medium weightings for product strategy and geographic strategy. Essentially, Ability to Execute measures current performance and delivery, while Completeness of Vision assesses future-oriented strategic thinking and market leadership.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements