Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for CPS Protection Platforms

How does Gartner define the CPS Protection Platforms market in 2026?

Gartner defines cyber-physical systems (CPS) protection platforms as products that discover, categorize, map and protect CPS in production or mission-critical environments outside of enterprise IT. They do so by analyzing or interacting with industrial/industry-specific protocols and operational network traffic. They understand physical process asset behavior and do not interfere with CPS operations. They can be delivered from the cloud, on-premises or in a hybrid form. Gartner defines CPS as engineered systems that orchestrate sensing, computation, control, networking and analytics to interact with the physical world (including humans). When secure, they enable safe, real-time, reliable, resilient and adaptable performance.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for CPS Protection Platforms in 2026

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the CPS Protection Platforms market evolved in 2026?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the CPS Protection Platforms space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 15 vendors in the CPS protection platforms market based on their ability to execute and completeness of vision. It covers vendors offering products that discover, categorize, map and protect CPS in production or mission-critical environments outside of enterprise IT by analyzing or interacting with industrial/industry-specific protocols and operational network traffic. The evaluation includes mandatory features such as vendor-native asset discovery, support for industrial protocols, network topology diagrams, detailed asset pedigrees, vulnerability information, and threat intelligence capabilities.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by cybersecurity leaders, CISOs, security architects, and operations technology (OT) security professionals who are responsible for securing cyber-physical systems in production or mission-critical environments. It is particularly relevant for organizations in critical infrastructure sectors such as energy, utilities, manufacturing, healthcare, transportation, and government that need to evaluate and select CPS protection platform vendors to support their security programs, meet regulatory compliance requirements, and protect against growing cyber threats to operational technology environments.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Mandatory features for vendors included in this market are: vendor-native asset discovery, visibility and categorization; support for modern and unique industrial/industry-specific protocols without interfering with device operations; detailed network topology and data flow diagrams; detailed asset pedigrees including manufacturer, model, serial number, addresses, operating system details for nested devices; vulnerability information with contextualized CVE/CVSS scores and exploitability likelihood; threat intelligence with simulations and recommended actions including playbooks and policy enforcement; integration with IT security and asset management tools; and risk scoring with remediation options and standards alignment impacts.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Not actively participating in the enterprise market as evidenced by lack of direct marketing to end-user customers
  • Not offering pure-play CPS protection platform - requiring purchase of other products or services
  • Platform not generally available as of 25 November 2025
  • Fewer than 100 unique enterprise customers with deployed platform in production environments
  • Not offering cloud-based or managed, hybrid and on-premises deployment options
  • Fewer than 10 paying customers in at least 8 of 22 specified industry categories
  • Revenue not from at least 3 geographic regions with at least 2 at or above 10%
  • Revenue below $50 million in 2024 without meeting alternative growth criteria

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors on the quality and efficacy of their processes, systems, methods and procedures to be competitive, efficient and effective, focusing on current operational capabilities, product quality, sales effectiveness, customer relationships, and market responsiveness. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors on their ability to articulate logical statements about current and future market direction, innovation, and customer needs, focusing on strategic planning, market understanding, innovation capabilities, and long-term product and geographic strategies.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements