Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms

How does Gartner define the Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms market in 2025?

Gartner defines a data science and machine learning platform as an integrated set of code-based libraries and low-code tooling. These platforms support the independent use and collaboration among data scientists and their business and IT counterparts, with automation and AI assistance through all stages of the data science life cycle, including business understanding, data access and preparation, model creation and sharing of insights. They also support engineering workflows, including the creation of data, feature, deployment and testing pipelines. The platforms are provided via desktop client or browser with supporting compute instances or as a fully managed cloud offering. Data science and machine learning (DSML) platforms are designed to enable a broad range of users to develop and apply a comprehensive suite of predictive and prescriptive analytical techniques. Leveraging data from distributed sources, code-first and low-code interfaces, and native machine learning and generative AI (GenAI) capabilities, these platforms enhance and automate decision making across an enterprise.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms in 2025

Strategic Planning Assumptions

How was the Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms market evolved in 2025?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers the data science and machine learning platform market, evaluating vendors' ability to provide integrated software solutions for building, customizing, and deploying AI models using various techniques including classical machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI. The report assesses platforms that support code-based and low-code development, collaboration across data scientists and business users, automation and AI assistance throughout the data science lifecycle, and MLOps practices for deploying and monitoring models in production.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by data science leaders, machine learning leaders, AI leaders, analytics leaders, and IT decision-makers who are evaluating and selecting DSML platforms for their organizations. It is particularly relevant for those looking to understand vendor capabilities in supporting AI agents, autonomous workflows, GenAI applications, composite AI systems, and enterprise-scale AI deployment across multiple environments. The research helps buyers assess vendors based on their ability to execute and completeness of vision in the DSML platform market.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Mandatory features for vendors included in this market are: (1) ability to import or connect to tabular data from various data management systems on-premises and in the cloud; (2) data preparation using transformation tools and packages; (3) code-based development environment; (4) building and evaluating models using a library of core data science and ML techniques; (5) collaboration and project management tools for multiple users and teams; (6) deployment, hosting and serving models for use in services and applications; (7) model life cycle management to promote, demote, retrain and retire models; and (8) administration and configuration management for user roles, permissions and resource allocation.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Withdrawal of DSML product offering and strategy change (e.g., Anaconda)
  • Platform not recommended for predominantly code-centric data science teams (e.g., KNIME)
  • Did not meet Customer Interest Index threshold for inclusion (e.g., Posit)
  • Did not meet revenue or growth thresholds
  • Insufficient geographic presence or customer base
  • Go-to-market strategy not focused on professional data scientist persona
  • Did not meet inclusion criteria for comprehensive DSML platform capabilities (e.g., Teradata, Aible)

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates a vendor's current operational capabilities and track record - focusing on product quality, financial viability, sales execution, market responsiveness, marketing effectiveness, customer experience, and operations. It assesses the vendor's capability to address current market trends and maintain visibility and customer demand. Completeness of Vision evaluates a vendor's strategic understanding and future direction - focusing on market understanding, strategic positioning with GenAI/DSML, go-to-market approach, product strategy depth, business model evolution, vertical focus, innovation commitment, and geographic strategy. It assesses the vendor's ability to understand market trends across diverse user groups and recognize how emerging technologies can advance data-driven decision making and AI system development.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements