Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Infrastructure Platform Consumption Services

How does Gartner define the Infrastructure Platform Consumption Services market in 2025?

Gartner defines the infrastructure platform consumption services (IPCS) market as a consumption-based, as-a-service offering for mission-critical infrastructure. IPCS-based offerings need to be native to the platform vendor control plane and must include either storage as a service (STaaS), compute as a service (CaaS) or network as a service (NaaS). They can also support data protection as a service (dPaaS). IPCS vendors use SLA-based outcomes rooted in automation and software-defined infrastructure to provide adaptable and modern platforms that support digital transformation. IT outcomes include improved productivity, cyberresilience, continuous workload infrastructure and cost optimization. IPCS's primary purpose is to provide a platform-services-based infrastructure to service the hybrid-cloud infrastructure data environment.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Infrastructure Platform Consumption Services in 2025

Strategic Planning Assumptions

How was the Infrastructure Platform Consumption Services market evolved in 2025?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Infrastructure Platform Consumption Services space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers infrastructure platform consumption services (IPCS) vendors that provide consumption-based, as-a-service offerings for mission-critical infrastructure including storage as a service (STaaS), compute as a service (CaaS), network as a service (NaaS), and data protection as a service (dPaaS). The report evaluates vendor capabilities across platform features, business models, SLA-based outcomes, AI-powered operations, ecosystem integration, and their ability to modernize IT operations through an on-premises cloud operating model.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: Heads of Infrastructure & Operations (I&O) should use this research to assess and compare IPCS vendor platform capabilities when modernizing infrastructure operations and shifting from traditional capex sourcing to consumption-based operational models. The research helps evaluate vendors on their ability to deliver SLA-based outcomes, support hybrid IT operations, provide comprehensive platform services across compute/storage/network domains, and enable digital transformation through pay-for-use subscription pricing models.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Mandatory features for vendors included in this market are: (1) A domain-specific as-a-service offering (storage, networking, or compute) that is native to the vendor's platform control plane; (2) A central AIOps-based tool for monitoring, observability and proactive SLA management; (3) A centralized control plane for infrastructure orchestration, provisioning and life cycle management; (4) A self-service portal for managing as-a-service features including metering, billing and capacity additions; and (5) A domain-specific enterprise platform data management service.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Offering only OEM solutions without owning the core infrastructure domain operating system native to the platform control plane
  • Insufficient revenue - less than $12 million in as-a-service consumption revenue through 30 June 2025
  • Insufficient customer base - fewer than 25 active production customers with GA installations by 30 June 2025
  • Limited geographic presence - supporting active customers in fewer than two of the five major geographical regions
  • Limited use case support - supporting fewer than three of five use cases or lacking hybrid IT operations support
  • Missing mandatory platform features such as standardized APIs, AI automation, centralized control plane, AIOps-based monitoring, self-service portal, or data management capabilities

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors' current capability to offer and support infrastructure platform services, covering features, viability, sales execution, market responsiveness, marketing execution, customer experience, and operations. It focuses on present-day execution and delivery. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors' market-driven ability to envision future infrastructure platform services capabilities, covering market understanding, strategies (marketing, sales, product, vertical, geographic), business model, and innovation. It focuses on forward-thinking vision and strategic direction for platform evolution.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements