Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Managed IoT Connectivity Services, Worldwide

How does Gartner define the Managed IoT Connectivity Services, Worldwide market in 2024?

Gartner defines managed IoT connectivity services as a market that enables connectivity, data collection and analysis, and additional decision services that are necessary for connected solutions. For large organizations, managed IoT connectivity services are normally delivered fully managed, including dedicated help desk and project and service management capabilities. For midsize and small organizations, they are frequently delivered as a self-service provided through an IoT connectivity management portal, including Level 2 and Level 3 back-office support. Connections can use various technologies including cellular (2G, 3G, 4G/LTE and 5G); satellite, low-power wide-area (LPWA) networks (3GPP and non-3GPP); and managed field-area networks (FANs). Additionally, managed IoT connectivity services may encompass integrated and managed IT infrastructure and systems, operational technology (OT) infrastructure and systems, software, network services (connectivity), and IT services.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Managed IoT Connectivity Services, Worldwide in 2024

Strategic Planning Assumptions

How was the Managed IoT Connectivity Services, Worldwide market evolved in 2024?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Managed IoT Connectivity Services, Worldwide space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 19 global vendors providing managed IoT connectivity services worldwide. It assesses their ability to enable connectivity, data collection and analysis, and decision services necessary for connected solutions across various technologies including cellular (2G-5G), satellite, LPWA networks, and managed field-area networks. The research examines vendors' capabilities across must-have features (sourcing/logistics, IoT connectivity management portals, service management, SIM management), standard features (device and security management), and optional features (application management, multisourcing integration, data/analytics).

Q: Who should use this research?

A: CIOs building IoT-enabled businesses should use this research to assess global vendors for IoT connectivity-related services when sourcing IoT connectivity and integrating it with devices and cloud IoT deployments across multiple geographies. The research helps reduce complexity in vendor selection by evaluating providers' ability to execute and completeness of vision, enabling organizations to select contracts that support critical functions and business objectives while assessing providers for future capabilities as enterprises work toward broader IoT solutions.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors must offer sourcing and logistics management, an IoT connectivity management portal for self-service and monitoring, comprehensive service management and support capabilities, and SIM and subscription management functionalities. These features enable enterprises to manage the complete lifecycle of their IoT connectivity from procurement through operational management.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Fewer than 7,500,000 connected IoT devices under management
  • Insufficient geographic presence (not serving at least three of five regions with direct local commercial presence)
  • Revenue below $32 million threshold
  • Insufficient customer wins (fewer than four new clients in three different regions)
  • Limited industry diversity (fewer than 100,000 connections in two industries)
  • Lack of comprehensive life cycle management services
  • No customer-facing portal for asset monitoring and management
  • Insufficient infrastructure (not operating as heavy or light MVNO)
  • Only offering bundled solutions without separate connectivity offerings

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors on current performance, focusing on the quality and efficacy of processes, systems, and methods that enable competitive, efficient, and effective performance. It emphasizes current product/service capabilities, sales execution, customer experience, and operations. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors on their ability to articulate logical statements about market direction, innovations, customer needs, and competitive forces. It focuses on future strategy, including market understanding, product roadmap, business model innovation, vertical/industry strategy, and geographic expansion plans. Essentially, Ability to Execute measures 'how well they do it now' while Completeness of Vision measures 'where they're going and how they'll get there.'

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements