Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Multichannel Marketing Hubs

How does Gartner define the Multichannel Marketing Hubs market in 2023?

Gartner defines the multichannel marketing hub (MMH) as a technology solution that orchestrates a company's communications and offers to customer segments across multiple channels. These channels include websites, mobile messaging, social, direct mail, call centers, paid media and email. MMH capabilities may also extend to integrating marketing offers/leads with sales for execution in both B2B and B2C environments. MMH capabilities include: demonstrated functionality and support for customer profile management, segmentation, campaign and message creation, campaign workflow, and message execution; basic multichannel marketing functionality supporting web, email, mobile, social marketing and programmatic advertising; advanced multichannel marketing functionality supporting personalization, content management, event triggering and real-time offer management; and advanced analytics functionality enabling customer-level data, analysis, experimentation and predictive analytics.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Multichannel Marketing Hubs in 2023

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Multichannel Marketing Hubs market evolved in 2023?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Multichannel Marketing Hubs space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 15 multichannel marketing hub (MMH) vendors based on their Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision. It covers vendors' capabilities in customer profile management, journey orchestration, personalization, multichannel marketing, paid media management, marketing analytics, and integration with other applications. The evaluation includes detailed vendor strengths and cautions, market trends including generative AI adoption, and analysis of three market submarkets: large enterprise application providers, emerging customer engagement specialists, and established campaign management providers.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: Digital marketing leaders responsible for multichannel marketing initiatives should use this research to identify suitable MMH solutions for their organizations. Users should study the evaluation criteria for Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision, evaluate vendor strengths and cautions, assess vendors across all four quadrants focusing on those that align with their requirements, and use this research in conjunction with the companion Critical Capabilities for Multichannel Marketing Hubs research and other multichannel marketing best practices publications. Prospects should factor in time, cost, and complexity of integrating MMH with other organizational and martech systems when building business cases.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Mandatory features for vendors included in this market include: (1) Demonstrated functionality for customer profile management, segmentation, campaign/message creation, workflow and execution; (2) Basic multichannel marketing functionality covering at least three basic channels (web, email, mobile, social, direct mail); (3) Advanced multichannel marketing functionality including personalization, content management, event triggering and real-time offer management; (4) Advanced analytics with customer-level data, experimentation (A/B testing) and predictive analytics capabilities; (5) Support for at least one advanced channel beyond basic channels; (6) Marketing analytics with preconfigured reports and dashboards; (7) Integration capabilities with at least two categories of adjacent solutions (CRM/SFA, digital commerce, content management, DAM/PIM, or data-sharing services).

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Insufficient customer base (fewer than 20 paying customers)
  • Limited new customer acquisition (fewer than 15 new deployments in past 12 months)
  • Revenue composition doesn't meet software threshold (less than 70% from software)
  • Low average customer value (less than $50,000 per customer)
  • Geographic concentration outside target markets (less than 60% revenue from North America/EMEA)
  • Limited regional presence (coverage in fewer than two of four regions)
  • Narrow industry focus (coverage of fewer than three of seven specified industries)
  • Financial viability concerns (not meeting minimum revenue or cash reserve requirements)
  • Incomplete MMH functionality (unable to demonstrate all required capabilities)
  • Lack of multichannel support (insufficient basic or advanced channel coverage)
  • Missing core capabilities in orchestration, analytics, or integration

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors on the quality and efficacy of their current processes, systems, methods and procedures that enable competitive, efficient and effective performance. It focuses on present capabilities including product quality, viability, sales execution, market responsiveness, marketing execution, customer experience and operations. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors on their ability to articulate logical statements about current and future market direction, innovation, customer needs and competitive forces. It assesses forward-looking capabilities including market understanding, strategic planning (marketing, sales, product, business model), vertical/industry strategy, innovation and geographic strategy. Essentially, Ability to Execute measures current execution and delivery, while Completeness of Vision measures strategic direction and future potential.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements