Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Observability Platforms

How does Gartner define the Observability Platforms market in 2024?

Gartner defines observability platforms as products that ingest telemetry (operational data) from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, logs, metrics, events and traces. They are used to understand the health, performance and behavior of applications, services and infrastructure. Observability platforms enable an analysis of the telemetry, either via human operator or machine intelligence, to determine changes in system behavior that impact end-user experience such as outages or performance degradation. This allows for early, and even preemptive, problem remediation. Observability solutions are used by IT operations, site reliability engineers, cloud and platform teams, application developers, and product owners. Modern businesses rely heavily on critical digital applications and services, which are revenue-generating, client-facing and important to the efficient operation of the business. Observability platforms are used by organizations to understand and improve the availability, performance and resilience of these critical applications and services.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Observability Platforms in 2024

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Observability Platforms market evolved in 2024?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Observability Platforms space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 17 observability platform vendors across their ability to execute and completeness of vision. It covers products that ingest telemetry from various sources (logs, metrics, events, traces) to understand health, performance and behavior of applications, services and infrastructure. The evaluation includes mandatory features like telemetry ingestion and analysis, change detection, and enrichment through contextualization. Common features assessed include digital experience monitoring, integration capabilities, cloud telemetry collection, interactive exploration, advanced analytics, automated discovery, cost management, business process monitoring, and application security functionality. Vendors are positioned across four quadrants: Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: I&O leaders, site reliability engineers, cloud and platform teams, application developers, and product owners should use this research to evaluate and select observability platform vendors. It helps organizations understand vendor positioning, strengths, and cautions to make informed decisions about observability investments. The research is particularly valuable for organizations looking to improve availability, performance and resilience of critical applications and services, enable faster product development cycles, avoid revenue loss from outages, and support use cases across IT operations, platform engineering, software development, and business analytics. It also assists with understanding the evolution from traditional APM to modern observability platforms and navigating the competitive landscape of SaaS-based solutions.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: At a minimum, observability platforms must: (1) Ingest, store and analyze operational telemetry feeds including metrics, events, logs and trace data; (2) Identify and analyze changes in application, service or infrastructure behavior to determine availability outages, performance degradation and impact on end-user experience; and (3) Enrich telemetry by providing contextualization through topological dependency mapping and relationships with and between business services. These three capabilities form the foundation that distinguishes observability platforms from traditional monitoring tools.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Failed to meet Customer Interest Indicator (CII) threshold
  • Did not meet minimum revenue requirements ($75M annual or $10M with 25% growth)
  • Fewer than 50 paying production customers across required geographic regions
  • Product was discontinued or not generally available
  • Did not meet inclusion criteria for market participation
  • Lacked native support for all mandatory capabilities
  • Did not support majority of common capabilities
  • SaaS delivery model not available or not primary offering
  • Unable to sell directly to customers without professional services requirement

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors on current performance, operational excellence, and market success - focusing on product quality, sales effectiveness, customer experience, viability, and responsiveness. It measures how well vendors are performing today. Completeness of Vision evaluates vendors on their strategic direction and future potential - focusing on market understanding, innovation, product strategy, business model, and geographic expansion plans. It measures how well vendors are positioned for future market leadership and their ability to anticipate and shape market evolution.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements