Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management

How does Gartner define the Privileged Access Management market in 2025?

Gartner defines privileged access management (PAM) as tools that provide an elevated level of technical access through the management and protection of accounts, credentials and commands, which are used to administer or configure systems and applications. PAM tools — available as software, SaaS or hardware appliances — manage privileged access for both people (system administrators and others) and machines (systems or applications). Gartner defines five distinct tool categories for PAM tools: privileged account and session management (PASM), privilege elevation and delegation management (PEDM), secrets management, cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM) and remote PAM (RPAM).

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management in 2025

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Privileged Access Management market evolved in 2025?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Privileged Access Management space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 12 vendors in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) market based on their ability to execute and completeness of vision. The research covers five distinct PAM tool categories: privileged account and session management (PASM), privilege elevation and delegation management (PEDM), secrets management, cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM), and remote PAM (RPAM). The evaluation includes product capabilities across 13 technical areas, pricing analysis across multiple scenarios, vendor viability, sales execution, customer experience, innovation, and strategic vision. Special emphasis is placed on emerging PAM for machines capabilities including workload identity and secrets management.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: IAM leaders and security professionals should use this research to: 1) Understand the current PAM market landscape and vendor positioning; 2) Evaluate PAM vendors based on specific use cases including PASM, PEDM, RPAM, and PAM for machines scenarios; 3) Compare vendor capabilities across technical features, pricing, customer experience, and innovation; 4) Make informed decisions when selecting PAM solutions that match their organization's requirements for managing privileged access for both humans and machines; 5) Understand emerging trends in the PAM market including AI-driven capabilities, secrets management, and CIEM; 6) Plan PAM implementation strategies and timelines; 7) Assess vendor strengths and cautions to align with organizational needs across different geographies and industry verticals.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors must provide: 1) Centralized management and enforcement of privileged access controlling either accounts/credentials or privileged commands; 2) Managing and brokering privileged access to authorized users and machines on a temporary basis; 3) Account discovery and onboarding across multiple systems and cloud providers; 4) Vaulting, rotation and management of privileged credentials including secured vault, automatic credential rotation, request/approval workflows, credential checkout, and credential injection in sessions; 5) Management, monitoring, recording and auditing for privileged sessions including remote privileged sessions without revealing credentials to users.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Not meeting all mandatory features for PAM
  • Meeting fewer than five out of eight common features
  • Incomplete or inadequate product documentation
  • Not marketed or deployed for production environments consistent with PAM objectives
  • Limited geographic presence (not competing in at least two major regional markets)
  • Operating as a reseller or third-party provider rather than developing own PAM product
  • Limited vertical/industry coverage
  • Not ranking in Top 15 for Customer Interest Indicator
  • Insufficient revenue ($30 million USD minimum) or customer base (1,200 paying customers minimum)
  • Features only listed or referenced in passing rather than fully documented and configured

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates current capabilities, financial health, sales effectiveness, market responsiveness, marketing execution, customer experience, and operational capability. It focuses on the vendor's current ability to deliver products and services successfully. Completeness of Vision assesses the vendor's understanding of market direction, strategic planning, innovation, and future roadmap. It focuses on the vendor's strategy to anticipate and shape market changes, develop differentiated offerings, and expand into new markets and verticals.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements