Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Sales Force Automation Platforms

How does Gartner define the Sales Force Automation Platforms market in 2023?

Sales force automation platforms are tools that natively support (not via third-party add-ons and solutions) automation and capture of sales activities, processes and administrative responsibilities for organizations' sales professionals. They also support initiation, engagement and capture of buyer-seller interactions through multiexperience and channel-agnostic approaches and devices, and dissemination of actionable insights to improve sales contact management, pipeline management, opportunity management, guided selling and forecasting process execution. The optimal desired experience for sales users (leadership, managers and sellers) are not limited to internal use cases, and can be scaled to support buyer-seller intermediation and shared experiences with prospects and customers.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Sales Force Automation Platforms in 2023

Strategic Planning Assumptions

How was the Sales Force Automation Platforms market evolved in 2023?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Sales Force Automation Platforms space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates 15 sales force automation (SFA) platform vendors that provide native capabilities for automating and capturing sales activities, processes, and administrative responsibilities. It covers vendors' abilities to support core SFA capabilities including lead, account, contact and opportunity management, sales activity management, collaboration, guided selling, pipeline and forecast management, mobile capabilities, analytics, partner relationship management, and platform integration. The research assesses both standard and optional capabilities such as CPQ, digital sales rooms, revenue intelligence, and sales engagement.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: Applications and software engineering leaders should use this research to support their CRM sales evaluation process. The research is particularly valuable for organizations evaluating SFA vendors for B2B sales, B2C sales, and indirect/relationship sales use cases. It helps buyers understand vendor positioning, strengths, and limitations across different deployment sizes (from small business to enterprise) and industries. The evaluation criteria and vendor assessments can guide technology selection decisions based on specific organizational needs for sales process automation, user experience, AI capabilities, and market responsiveness.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors must natively support (not via third-party add-ons) the following mandatory features: account/contact/opportunity management for tracking customer relationships and deals; sales activity management for capturing interactions; pipeline management with predictive/prescriptive analytics; forecast management with automation capabilities; lead management including nurturing, conversion tracking and attribution; guided selling with formal playbooks and rule-based recommendations; platform extensibility with custom UIs, data objects, fields and workflows; multi-channel buyer engagement (minimum: web portal, SMS, chat, email); mobile capabilities with native apps or mobile web that work offline; and visualization/analytics capabilities. Additionally, vendors must demonstrate ability to integrate with third-party applications via open APIs.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Insufficient breadth of native SFA capabilities - relying on third-party add-ons for core functionality
  • Limited market presence - fewer than 50 customers or inadequate industry diversity
  • Small deployment sizes - average fewer than 25 paid users per customer
  • Insufficient revenue scale - less than $14M in SFA-specific revenue
  • Limited product innovation - fewer than 2 major releases with significant improvements in evaluation period
  • Narrow use case support - inability to support at least 2 of 3 core sales models (B2B, B2C, indirect)
  • Missing critical capabilities from Level 1 inclusion criteria
  • Vertical-specific solutions without cross-industry applicability

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates current performance and operational capabilities - focusing on product quality, sales success, market responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and organizational viability. It measures what vendors are delivering today. Completeness of Vision evaluates strategic direction and future potential - focusing on market understanding, innovation roadmap, product strategy, and ability to anticipate and shape future market needs. It measures where vendors are heading and their potential to influence the market.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements