Report:

Magic Quadrant for Integration Platform as a Service

Top Vendor Products for Integration Platform as a Service in 2024

• Boomi
• Informatica
• Microsoft
• Oracle
• Salesforce (MuleSoft)
• SAP
• Workato

Integration Platform as a Service Vendor Product Comparisons 2024

• Boomi - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Offering (product) strategy: Boomi is continuing to invest in AI augmentation of the platform to improve productivity, its SLA of 99.99%, disaster recovery times, security options and other services, and to simplify use.
  • Market responsiveness/record: Boomi has adjusted its delivery model to accelerate the delivery of several new capabilities, such as Boomi Labs to foster collaboration, Boomi Event Streams and Boomi Integration Quick Start.
  • Customer experience: Boomi provides a customer success program together with a training program that has resulted in over 30,000 individuals being certified on various Boomi services. Boomi customers have rated Boomi highly as a vendor and for its products on Gartner Peer Insights.

  Cons:

  • Geographic strategy: While Boomi has direct commercial presence in most regions, its data center locations are split across its services — Boomi Platform is managed from the U.S., while Boomi Flow adds European and Asia/Pacific control planes for its services. Potential prospects should check with Boomi to understand what mix of platforms will be required for their use cases.
  • Sales execution/pricing: Boomi remains in the top five iPaaS vendors based on Gartner estimates for revenue and customer numbers. Yet despite double-digit growth in both metrics, Boomi did not keep pace with the market average for this Magic Quadrant cycle.
  • Product or service: Boomi has some basic managed file transfer (MFT) and intelligent document processing (IDP) features. However, it uses a partner model for more advanced MFT, IDP and robotic process automation (RPA). Clients hoping for a single vendor approach for these capabilities would need to investigate whether Boomi has enough depth to support their use cases.


• Informatica - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Vertical/industry strategy: Informatica provides a broad range of vertical and industry solutions, including lines of business, application ecosystems and industry clouds, as well as a wide range of public cloud infrastructure.
  • Operations: With a strong focus on platform security, regional availability, a wide range of deployment options, a four-hour recovery time objective (RTO)/recovery point objective (RPO) for disaster recovery scenarios, and a large partner network, operations was one of Informatica's highest-scoring criteria.
  • Product or service: Informatica performed well for its breadth of functional capabilities, its features for integrator productivity, platform versatility and its focus on platform security.

  Cons:

  • Innovation: Informatica fell short of other Leaders in this Magic Quadrant for innovation in collaboration features. However, there are several features in its product roadmap that will look to address this in 2024.
  • Marketing strategy: Informatica's successful messaging around its data management credentials has increased market perception that the vendor is best suited for complex, data-centric integration use cases at the expense of simpler use cases.
  • Customer experience: Informatica's customer experience ratings on Gartner Peer Insights for its product and as a vendor lagged behind those of other Leaders in this Magic Quadrant. Informatica clients cite ease of use and platform complexity as areas of concern.


• Microsoft - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Geographic strategy: Microsoft has a strong presence globally and continues to focus on being present on a global stage. It has direct support presence in all regions, a broad partner support network and many options for runtime and control planes, with Azure Arc extending Azure beyond data centers.
  • Sales execution/pricing: Microsoft has one flexible and transparent pricing model per service that allows organizations to start small and scale out at their own pace. Microsoft also provides freemium trial options that give prospective customers the confidence to build out Azure solutions based on need, rather than worrying about getting locked into expensive, long-term contracts.
  • Viability: Prospective customers looking for assurances in this area will value as integration technologies continue to get investments from Microsoft's status as a large company with a healthy financial profile. Microsoft's integration strategy is fundamental to drive adoption of the Azure platform.

  Cons:

  • Market understanding: Microsoft has a dual strategy with Azure and Power Platform. Microsoft targets software engineers and integration specialists using Azure integration services to provide integration capabilities. Microsoft also targets citizen technologists via its Power Platform to implement simple processes and workflow automation. However, Microsoft does not provide a user experience for business technologists looking to solve complex integration use cases.
  • Sales strategy: Microsoft's sales strategy is congruent with its market understanding, directly targeting IT and OEM/ISV buyers for Azure and business unit buyers for Power Platform. While Azure has a marketplace, it doesn't feature on other marketplaces and its stand-alone integration sales strategy is less visible than the strategies of other Leaders in this Magic Quadrant.
  • Vertical strategy: Microsoft has a limited vertical iPaaS strategy, instead focusing on generic integration capabilities. Indeed, it has no plans for PIPs. While Microsoft does provide templates via the Azure Integration Services Landing Zone and has many case studies of successfully implementing Azure Integration Services across a wide range of industries, it lacks targeted PIPs for specific industry, line-of-business and application ecosystem use cases.


• Oracle - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Geographic strategy: Oracle operates in more than 55 countries and has a global network of partners. Its iPaaS offering is deployed across 46 public cloud regions in 23 countries. Its global presence provides customers with widely available access to local Oracle expertise in most regions.
  • Market understanding: As one of the Leaders in the iPaaS market, based on Gartner estimates of market share, Oracle continues to demonstrate a strong understanding of enterprise integration needs. With its focus on combining integration and automation, Oracle provides support for diverse use cases across multiple deployment models while supporting multipersona experiences and collaboration.
  • Operations: Oracle's offering has high availability across the North America, EMEA, Asia/Pacific and Latin America regions. The platform provides strong disaster recovery capabilities, zero downtime upgrade and patching, and high-volume message throughput.

  Cons:

  • Marketing strategy: Oracle's offering is mostly attractive to customers using Oracle's business applications. Prospective customers not using an ecosystem of Oracle applications may overlook Oracle as a suitable candidate for their integration scenarios.
  • Market responsiveness: Oracle has delivered only six major releases and six minor releases over the last 12 months. Oracle has added features for private endpoint connectivity, collaboration and AI in process automation, but is still playing catch-up in terms of augmented integration capabilities.
  • Product or service: Oracle lags behind its competition for innovative features added for integrator productivity — like AI assistance for integration development.


• Salesforce (MuleSoft) - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Customer experience: Per Gartner Peer Insights, Salesforce (MuleSoft) scores high in customer satisfaction and users recommend it frequently. Reviewers emphasize the maturity of the platform, breadth of application connectors and product support.
  • Operations: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides high availability and disaster recovery and is supported by a globally distributed network of data centers, with a global implementation partner bench making professional services widely available.
  • Product/service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a wide set of capabilities, with significant depth in the composite service integration pattern. Salesforce (MuleSoft)'s prescribed mediated services architecture, in concert with the large connector exchange, brings customers the benefits of standardization of competency and architecture around a powerful platform.

  Cons:

  • Sales execution/pricing: Recent consumption-based pricing is being rolled-out for customers in North and South America as the default pricing model. For many existing customers and all remaining geographies, the vCore is the predominant pricing lever, which presents a challenge for prospective customers that often cannot easily estimate their vCore usage.
  • Market responsiveness/record: Salesforce (MuleSoft) markets its Anypoint Platform with a prescription for a layered, composite services integration architecture for strategic transformation. However, this is often too heavy for simple use cases. While Salesforce (MuleSoft) has responded with the release of its automation bundle, aimed at business technologists, it is late to the market and its iPaaS offering lacks visibility compared with other Leaders' offerings.
  • Offering (product) strategy: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform primarily appeals to integration specialists and software engineers. Salesforce (MuleSoft) has several other services targeting iPaaS use cases for business technologists, but the strategy is spread across Salesforce branded offerings and MuleSoft branded offerings, leading to customer confusion with regards to product naming.


• SAP - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Customer experience: Customers highly recommend SAP Integration Suite to their peers and score the product highly for customer satisfaction. Many positive reviews on Gartner's Peer Insights platform emphasize the monitoring features and design experience.
  • Geographic strategy: SAP maintains a significant and geographically distributed commercial and support presence, data centers and partnerships with systems integrators (SIs). SAP operates data centers across all geographic regions and can run on AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform and Alibaba Cloud, as well as in client data centers and data centers for regulated industries.
  • Product or service: Through SAP Business Accelerator Hub, customers can leverage PIPs to accelerate the delivery of business outcomes, such as lead to cash, recruit to hire and source to pay. The platform also provides the ability to build new solutions upon reusable components, endpoints and events sourced from across the SAP and non-SAP application portfolios.

  Cons:

  • Marketing execution: While there is a positive perception of SAP Integration Suite, it is still viewed in the market as an SAP-centric offering rather than a general-purpose integration platform.
  • Business model: SAP's business model for Integration Suite and the larger BTP is focused on being sold predominantly alongside SAP applications and modernization initiatives.
  • Sales execution/pricing: BTP's pricing is transparent and publicly available, but SAP does not tailor pricing to market segments and organization sizes — a practice that has become increasingly common in this market to increase appeal to the public sector, as well as nonprofit and education sectors. In addition, some clients are cautious of the low introductory pricing that SAP offers for BTP.


• Workato - Leader
  

  Pros:

  • Product or service: Workato earned strong product scores for its versatility, security features and breadth of functional capabilities. The biggest contributors to its scores are the productivity enabled by the platform's intuitive user experience, its prebuilt content, and application of AI to generate integrations and connectors.
  • Customer experience: On Gartner Peer Insights, customers report very high satisfaction with both the product and the vendor, with a large percentage indicating they would recommend Workato to peers. Customer reviews frequently cite the platform's user or developer experience as a key strength.
  • Marketing execution: Workato's growth in market mind share is a result of both its presence across mainstream application ecosystems' marketplaces and the successful execution of marketing initiatives. Such initiatives include AI and automation hackathons, university collaborations, presence at industry events and forming valuable partnerships with consultancies.

  Cons:

  • Geographic strategy: Workato relies on AWS data centers, and its expansion plan into other AWS data centers does not keep pace with other Leaders in this market. Although the vendor's sales footprint is global, prospective customers should verify Workato's data center and support footprint is suitable for their compliance posture and nonfunctional requirements, such as performance.
  • Sales execution/pricing: Workato's pricing is based on a blended model of platform license and recipes, each allocated a set amount of tasks. Customers report that, while this model is easy to understand and predict, the costs escalate quickly, decreasing the appeal of implementing new process recipes on the platform.
  • Operations: Compared with other Leaders in this Magic Quadrant, Workato has a smaller geographic presence with fewer offices globally. Prospects should ensure Workato can meet their expectations for local support resources.


• Amazon Web Services - Challenger
  

  Pros:

  • Sales execution and pricing: AWS provides public pricing for its different integration services, along with pricing examples and calculators. This provides pricing transparency for clients evaluating the AWS offering and helps them determine the total cost of ownership.
  • Operations: AWS offers high availability for its integration services across all major geographies. It also provides a seamless patching and upgrading experience to its customer base.
  • Geographic presence: AWS has a direct commercial and support presence, as well as an array of data centers for hosting its integration services, in all major regions — North America, Asia/Pacific, Latin America, and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA). In addition, AWS customers can benefit from its large global partner network.

  Cons:

  • Product or service: AWS does not provide a unified platform offering like many of the vendors in this Magic Quadrant. It has limited support for EDI/B2B use cases and also lags behind its competitors in offering a breadth of connectors and adding augmented integration capabilities.
  • Market understanding: AWS' iPaaS offerings appeal to mostly developers who perform integration as part of their application development initiatives within the AWS ecosystem. AWS lacks mind share in this space among business technologists and integration specialists for their integration needs.
  • Vertical/industry strategy: AWS does not provide the same breadth of industry offerings and vertical-specific solutions or PIPs as some of its competitors. Prospects focusing on leveraging out-of-the-box PIPs should verify if AWS can cater to their needs.


• Celigo - Visionary
  

  Pros:

  • Market responsiveness: Celigo has improved its release cycle and adjusted the platform based on customer feedback. This has included overhauling its approach to EDI, API management and PIPs, the addition of GenAI and an improved offering for data integration.
  • Customer experience: Celigo has one of the highest customer experience ratings on Gartner Peer Insights out of the evaluated vendors, reflecting its focus on accommodating its target integrator persona. Reviews often mention ease of use, speed of building integrations and responsive support.
  • Sales strategy: Celigo's selling point is centered around empowering line-of-business and business technologists to collaborate with enterprise IT through a fusion team approach. Clients like the messaging around connecting business processes, instead of technical language around IT and integration. Celigo plays to these strengths selling directly to business units with PIPs.

  Cons:

  • Geographic strategy: Celigo is expanding its global presence; however, compared with its competitors, it has a smaller presence outside of North America. Gartner estimates that two-thirds of Celigo clients are in North America, with the rest distributed across EMEA, Asia/Pacific and Latin America. Organizations outside of North America considering Celigo should confirm that they will have access to local expertise and support.
  • Product or service: Celigo's focus has been on ease of use and speed of delivery for application integration use cases. Celigo isn't widely adopted for heavy data integration or EDI use cases, but it plans to address these use cases in its product roadmap.
  • Marketing execution: Even though Celigo scored high for customer experience, Celigo's brand awareness lags behind some of its competitors. This gap between customer and market perception of the product reflects Celigo's challenges in delivering its messaging and executing in the market.


• Jitterbit - Visionary
  

  Pros:

  • Offering (product) strategy: Since last year's Magic Quadrant, Jitterbit has expanded its integration capabilities to address additional use cases. These include Harmony EDI, a cloud-based EDI application, and Jitterbit Message Queue Service, a cloud-based messaging service.
  • Vertical/industry strategy: Jitterbit has extended its features for automating key integration use cases to accelerate development through PIPs, templates, recipes and application connectors. This will enhance its capabilities for industry-specific solutions for manufacturing, retail, healthcare, education and technology, and for application areas such as ERP, CRM and HCM.
  • Innovation: Jitterbit received higher-than-average scores for its AI features, its focus on different integration personas, and expanded breadth of use cases.

  Cons:

  • Marketing strategy: Jitterbit has traditionally targeted IT users and still has limited visibility among business technologists compared with its competitors. As a result, prospective customers often overlook Jitterbit as an offering for business users.
  • Sales execution and pricing: Jitterbit uses an endpoint-based pricing model for iPaaS. Public information about pricing is limited to describing the different tier levels, which makes it challenging for prospective customers to evaluate actual expected costs and compare pricing with competitors.
  • Operations: Jitterbit has data centers in North America and Europe and plans to add one in South America, but it has a relatively small employee base and no data centers in the Middle East or Africa. Prospective customers should assess access to localized sales, training and support, as well as any data residency requirements.


• SnapLogic - Visionary
  

  Pros:

  • Innovation: SnapLogic has delivered innovative features to accelerate and simplify integration development. It has extended its capabilities with SnapGPT, a natural-language tool to assist and accelerate integration development; AutoIDP, which uses AI to digitize and extract data and insights from business documents and is now part of SnapLogic's GenAI Builder; and enhanced API management features.
  • Sales strategy: SnapLogic provides transparent pricing and tools to estimate costs. It has also extended the marketplaces where IIP is available beyond AWS to include Microsoft Azure and Google. SnapLogic uses global, vertical and local partnerships to support more successful implementations, and enables OEMs or ISVs to white label and embed the iPaaS in their own offerings.
  • Market understanding: SnapLogic has differentiated capabilities and messaging for line-of-business and central IT buyers, as well as features for collaboration between different types of users. It has focused on boosting productivity by providing connectors and templates for common applications and data sources, as well as PIPs for the most common processes across multiple industries.

  Cons:

  • Product or service: SnapLogic does not provide as comprehensive capabilities for MFT or event broker services as other vendors in this Magic Quadrant. Instead, it focuses on connectors to third parties to provide these features. This may not suit organizations looking for a single vendor to provide these features.
  • Operations: SnapLogic provides cloud-hosted data planes in North America, EMEA and Asia/Pacific. However, North America accounts for about two-thirds of SnapLogic's client base and SnapLogic has a smaller employee base outside of North America than other vendors in this Magic Quadrant. Prospective customers outside of North America should confirm as part of the evaluation process that they have access to local expertise and support, and that the vendor can meet their data residency requirements.
  • Customer experience: On Gartner Peer Insights, customers rate SnapLogic in the middle of vendors in this Magic Quadrant. Customers have cited testing and debugging as areas for improvement, which SnapLogic looks to address with its generative AI investment.


• Software AG - Visionary
  

  Pros:

  • Product or service: Software AG is rated highly for functional capabilities, integrator productivity, platform versatility and platform security.
  • Market responsiveness: With changes to its development processes, Software AG now has a platform that is updated frequently and able to evolve rapidly. This is reflected in the number of updates and features added to the platform in this Magic Quadrant cycle, based on market demands.
  • Innovation: Software AG has reimagined its iPaaS offering, putting AI at the center of the platform and focusing on ease of use and collaboration. As a result of this new focus on the iPaaS market, Software AG is closing the gap on the competition.

  Cons:

  • Customer experience: Software AG's customer experience was rated toward the lower end of the vendors in this year's Magic Quadrant. On Gartner Peer Insights, customers cite support issues, monitoring and user experience as areas for improvement.
  • Marketing strategy: While Software AG attempts to differentiate from the competition with its Super iPaaS messaging, it has failed to acknowledge how the iPaaS market has evolved to include many of the features that Software AG states are lacking. Features such as AI-augmented integration, real-time event processing and "build once, run anywhere" have been part of most leading iPaaS offerings for a number of years.
  • Sales execution/pricing: As an established integration vendor, Software AG has been getting iPaaS market share from a combination of migrating existing Software AG integration software customers to iPaaS, and onboarding new customers for complex integration use cases. While this approach works well for large accounts, it results in Software AG being rarely shortlisted for prospects with simpler use cases.


• Tray.io - Visionary
  

  Pros:

  • Sales strategy: With its prepackaged integration templates and ease of use, Tray.io is successful in attracting customers that wish to automate business applications and processes. Tray.io's free trial offering is effective in converting users to paying customers. Its go-to-market approach targets ISVs and business users in midsize and large enterprises, and is increasingly focusing on targeting integration specialists and developers by providing multiuser experiences.
  • Market responsiveness: Tray.io operates on a continuous delivery model and has released more than 1,600 updates to its platforms in the last 12 months. These include combining its embedded and platform capabilities into a single product, new functionality, connectors and connector endpoints. Tray.io proactively solicits feedback from its customers via multiple channels to improve and expand its product features.
  • Innovation: Tray.io is focused on building a composable platform with its augmented integration capability at its heart, called Merlin AI. This will enable multipersona user experiences by providing NLP-based integration development and an AI-powered digital assistant. Tray.io's vision aligns with customer demand for augmented intelligence, automation and ease of use.

  Cons:

  • Geographic strategy: Tray.io is continuing to expand its geographic presence by adding additional data centers in Europe and Asia/Pacific. However, over 75% of its customer base is in North America. It has no data centers in Latin America or the Middle East and Africa. In addition, it does not decouple its runtime plane from its control plane, which may deter clients in these regions from considering it if they have strict data residency requirements.
  • Operations: Relative to its competitors in this Magic Quadrant, Tray.io has a small employee base and runs in a handful of data centers across North America, Europe and Asia/Pacific. Clients considering Tray.io should evaluate how well the vendor can meet their disaster recovery objectives.
  • Sales execution and pricing: Tray.io provides simple evaluation via a self-service trial, but does not provide public pricing and tailored pricing for different markets. Tray.io's direct customer base grew below market average, and a significant share of its revenue is generated from ISVs embedding Tray.io's integration capabilities into their products.


• Frends - Niche Player
  

  Pros:

  • Customer experience: Frends received good ratings for satisfaction and ease of product use on Gartner Peer Insights. Frends actively solicits customer feedback to improve its product. Customers can see roadmap and development progress in a public forum and can request and vote for new features to be prioritized.
  • Market responsiveness: Frends' community engagement helps it align its product strategy with changing customer demands. The vendor is also quick to respond to new opportunities, enabling it to benefit from Microsoft BizTalk migration and app modernization initiatives.
  • Sales execution/pricing: Frends has publicly available pricing and offers tools to estimate costs. It offers different editions to support different market segments and can provide tailored pricing based on specific requirements.

  Cons:

  • Deployment models: Frends can run on OpenStack, so is supported in other clouds and on-premises. However, it is predominantly deployed on Microsoft Azure and offers limited deployment options compared with other vendors in this Magic Quadrant. Frends has plans to support more deployment options, including embedded integration capabilities, to enable independent software vendor (ISV) partners to include Frends within their own solutions.
  • Product strategy: In the last year, Frends has extended its capabilities to support additional integration use cases. However, it does not have the breadth of integration capabilities seen in other vendor offerings and its AI-augmented development features, while growing, are less well-established than those of other vendors.
  • Marketing strategy: Frends has expanded its marketing to include business technologists, but it predominantly focuses on lease of use and time to deploy for integration specialists and software engineers. This focus on the IT user may discourage business technologist adoption. Frends predominantly targets users in Western and Northern Europe and has a limited presence outside of these regions.


• Huawei - Niche Player
  

  Pros:

  • Product or service: With the addition of several capabilities, Huawei ROMA now supports one of the broadest sets of integration services available in the market.
  • Customer experience: Huawei provides comprehensive customer success support, including a training program that has enabled over 6,500 developers to be trained on the ROMA platform.
  • Innovation: Huawei's core innovative features include AI-driven data cleansing, coordination and data transformation prediction capabilities. Its innovation roadmap comprises a long list of items, such as serverless architectures, unified runtimes, multiparty trusted sharing, embedded site deployment and integration capabilities for blockchains.

  Cons:

  • Operations: Gartner estimates that over three-quarters of Huawei's processing volume occurs in the Chinese mainland, with the rest distributed across Latin America, the Middle East and Africa. These data centers provide class-leading SLAs. Organizations outside of the region should press Huawei for assurances on more localized operations or similar SLAs for locally deployed edge instances.
  • Geographic strategy: While efforts have been made to broaden Huawei's appeal outside of China, with good growth reported in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, its customer base is mostly Chinese companies expanding globally rather than companies local to other regions.
  • Vertical/industry strategy: Huawei's strategy for lines of business, cloud platforms and vendor ecosystems is not as comprehensive as that of other vendors in this Magic Quadrant.


• IBM - Niche Player
  

  Pros:

  • Product or service: IBM continues to offer one of the most comprehensive sets of integration capabilities to address complex enterprise-grade use cases. IBM performed highest for its breadth of functional capabilities, its features for integrator productivity and platform versatility, though these ratings were split across several independent IBM services.
  • Viability: IBM's large revenue stream, stable growth numbers that match similarly sized vendors, and performance provide confidence to customers looking for a reliable organization with a proven track record.
  • Geographic strategy: IBM is a global company with sales and support teams worldwide. Its strategy involves leveraging its large partner network to provide locality to its global services. This includes expansion of control and data planes on Microsoft Azure and AWS to cover more regions, solving concerns of data residency for certain customers.

  Cons:

  • Market understanding: IBM's demonstrated understanding of PaaS versus SaaS versus managed services has been inconsistent across its portfolio. This has resulted in confusing and often conflicting messaging across its range of iPaaS services.
  • Innovation: IBM has focused its development efforts on operational improvements; for example, enabling support for App Connect and API Connect as vendor-managed services on AWS. As a result, IBM has shown less innovation than other vendors in this Magic Quadrant for features and functions that improve adoption and collaboration across its iPaaS services to provide a more integrated user experience.
  • Customer experience: Based on Gartner's Peer Insights reviews, IBM's various iPaaS services are rated lower than those of other evaluated vendors. IBM clients value the product capabilities, but note complexity, cost and support as dislikes. Reviews generally target a specific product and how it performs as part of a larger iPaaS, which masks concerns that arise from combining products into a larger iPaaS framework.


• TIBCO Software - Niche Player
  

  Pros:

  • Geographic strategy: TIBCO has been active in IT markets for decades. Given its lineage, strengths in global partnerships, runtimes and data center coverage, as well as direct and commercial support presence globally, TIBCO products are implemented around the world with customers from all industry backgrounds.
  • Operations: TIBCO's Partner Program is geographically distributed, and the availability of professional services enables the vendor to support the needs of midsize customers locally at global scale.
  • Product or service: TIBCO Cloud Integration provides a breadth of integration capabilities, with synergies between other TIBCO products from across technology categories. The capabilities provided are at the quality level sought out by enterprise customers.

  Cons:

  • Marketing strategy: TIBCO's strategy is to unify its business intelligence, data integration, analytics, iPaaS, master data management (MDM), and data management portfolio into a single hybrid multicloud platform. This will reduce TIBCO's appeal for smaller clients with simpler needs and favor larger clients with more complex operational requirements.
  • Innovation: TIBCO has redirected its resources with its shift toward a single hybrid multicloud platform approach. It is unclear how much innovation to expect for the Cloud Integration product in the next 12 months beyond key customer-driven enhancements. As a result, innovation was one of TIBCO's lowest-scoring criteria.
  • Market responsiveness/record: Compared with other vendors, TIBCO publishes fewer releases annually of new features and improvements for its iPaaS customers.

Reference

• Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Integration Platform as a Service, 19 February 2024, ID G00786667

View Market Definition
View Vendor Movements