Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Digital Employee Experience Management Tools

How does Gartner define the Digital Employee Experience Management Tools market in 2024?

Digital employee experience (DEX) management tools measure and continuously improve the performance of and employee sentiment toward company-provided technology. Near-real-time processing of aggregated data from endpoints, applications, employee sentiment and organizational context surfaces actionable insights and drives self-healing automations, optimized support and employee engagement. Insights and self-healing can enhance employee interactions with self-service portals and chatbots. They also help IT support, asset management, procurement and other teams whose work depends on reliable information. DEX tools help IT leaders improve the digital employee experience and empower IT workers to shift focus from technology management to more business-value-added work.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Digital Employee Experience Management Tools in 2024

Strategic Planning Assumptions

How was the Digital Employee Experience Management Tools market evolved in 2024?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Digital Employee Experience Management Tools space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research covers the Digital Employee Experience (DEX) Management Tools market, evaluating 16 vendors across their ability to execute and completeness of vision. It analyzes tools that measure and continuously improve the performance of and employee sentiment toward company-provided technology through near-real-time processing of aggregated data from endpoints, applications, employee sentiment and organizational context. The research includes vendor strengths and cautions, evaluation criteria, market overview, and quadrant positioning (Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players).

Q: Who should use this research?

A: This research should be used by end-user services and digital workplace leaders who are evaluating, selecting, or implementing DEX tool vendors. It is designed for IT leaders looking to improve digital employee experience, reduce digital friction, shift IT focus from technology management to business-value-added work, and establish or mature their DEX strategy. Organizations seeking to reduce IT overhead through automation, improve IT support, enhance endpoint configuration, and increase workforce engagement and digital dexterity should use this research to guide vendor selection decisions.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Mandatory features for DEX management tools include: (1) Data Collection capabilities with a Windows agent, HR system/directory services integration, ITSM platform integration, APIs for importing data, and employee sentiment surveys; (2) Analysis and Insights features including DEX scoring, anomaly detection, device and application usage tracking, and root cause analysis; (3) Taking Action capabilities through script execution, self-healing automation, employee engagement via notifications or collaboration tools, a predefined library of scripts and automations, and customer-defined workflows. These features represent the minimum requirements for a solution to be considered a complete DEX management tool.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Product only available as add-on to another product rather than stand-alone
  • Core DEX capabilities dependent on third-party functionality or white-labeled
  • Product not generally available before 31 October 2023
  • Missing mandatory data collection features (Windows agent, HR/directory integration, ITSM integration, APIs, sentiment surveys)
  • Missing mandatory analysis features (DEX scoring, anomaly detection, usage tracking, root cause analysis)
  • Missing mandatory action features (script execution, employee engagement, predefined library, workflows)
  • Using only browser extensions or server-based agents instead of endpoint agents
  • Vendor not ranking in top 20 of customer interest index (CII)
  • Insufficient market presence or customer awareness

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute evaluates vendors on their current product quality, operational capabilities, sales effectiveness, market presence, and ability to deliver on their vision today. It focuses on present-day execution including product features, viability, pricing, responsiveness, marketing reach, customer support, and operational scale. Completeness of Vision assesses vendors on their strategic direction, innovation, and future positioning. It evaluates their understanding of market opportunities, strategic planning for product development, business model sustainability, and vision for addressing future customer needs and competitive forces. Essentially, Ability to Execute measures current performance while Completeness of Vision measures future potential and strategic positioning.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements