Spotlight

Report:

Magic Quadrant for Collaborative Work Management

How does Gartner define the Collaborative Work Management market in 2024?

Gartner defines the collaborative work management (CWM) market as the market for stand-alone software tools that provide task-driven workspaces to enable end users to plan, coordinate and automate their work. These tools provide an integrated assembly of user-friendly capabilities for work planning, in-context collaboration, content collaboration, workflow and automation, reporting, analysis and dashboarding, intelligent assistance, and use-case acceleration on a platform that handles data management and administrative operations. Tools are defined by their purpose (work planning and execution), target users and breadth of functionality.

Key Facts for Magic Quadrant for Collaborative Work Management in 2024

Strategic Planning Assumptions

No strategic planning assumptions provided.

How was the Collaborative Work Management market evolved in 2024?

What product features are required to be included in this year's evaluation?

What are the common features of top products in the Collaborative Work Management space?

Scope Exclusions

Inclusion Criteria

Vendors must, among other requirements:

Ability to Execute — Relative Weighting

Completeness of Vision — Relative Weighting

FAQs

Q: What does this research cover?

A: This research evaluates stand-alone collaborative work management (CWM) software tools that provide task-driven workspaces for end users to plan, coordinate and automate their work. It assesses nine major vendors (Adobe, Airtable, Asana, Atlassian, ClickUp, monday.com, Quickbase, Smartsheet, and Wrike) based on their ability to execute and completeness of vision. The report covers mandatory and common features including work planning, in-context collaboration, content collaboration, workflow/automation, reporting/analytics, intelligent assistance, platform operations, and use-case accelerators.

Q: Who should use this research?

A: Application leaders and business technology professionals should use this research to navigate the expanding CWM market and select suitable vendor options for their business needs. It helps evaluate vendors for various use cases including work planning and execution, team collaboration, marketing operations, project management, service delivery, and digital transformation initiatives. The research should be used in combination with the Critical Capabilities for Collaborative Work Management report and Gartner's client inquiry service for vendor shortlisting based on specific requirements.

Q: What are the mandatory features of vendors included in this market?

A: Vendors included in this market must offer two mandatory features: (1) Work planning functionality for breaking work activities into tasks, establishing dependencies, and specifying timelines, resources and budgets; and (2) In-context collaboration functionality that provides team spaces where participants can discuss and share documentation relevant to a business activity, update plans based on new information, and send and receive notifications in the context of specific activities.

Q: What are some reasons for not being included in this report?

A:

  • Product requires purchase of a separate, non-CWM software platform to obtain CWM functionality
  • Not actively participating as a pure-play provider of stand-alone CWM software
  • Lacks solid track record of successful CWM technology sales, deployments and consulting services
  • Does not offer integrated capabilities across work planning, collaboration, content collaboration, workflow/automation, reporting, intelligent assistance, and use-case acceleration
  • Product has not been generally available with active marketing to business users for at least five years
  • Insufficient market presence - lacks sales and support for multiple regions or does not have at least 20% of revenue from regions outside primary region
  • Does not meet minimum financial thresholds - less than $70 million in revenue from user subscriptions OR less than 300 full-time employees dedicated to CWM product in 2023
  • Does not meet minimum customer acquisition thresholds - fewer than 300 new active paying customers OR fewer than 30,000 new paying end-user subscriptions in 2023
  • Does not meet minimum customer scale thresholds - fewer than 100 current active customers with annual contract value exceeding $100,000 OR fewer than 100 current paying customers with more than 1,000 users each
  • Does not rank among top 20 vendors according to composite Customer Interest Indicator score
  • Primary use case is as a collaborative content workspace (CCW) application rather than CWM tool for work planning and execution

Q: What differentiates Ability to Execute vs. Completeness of Vision?

A: Ability to Execute focuses on current capabilities and performance - evaluating vendors on product quality, sales effectiveness, customer satisfaction, and operational excellence. Product/Service and Customer Experience are weighted high as these drive vendor selection. Completeness of Vision assesses future-oriented strategic positioning - evaluating vendors on their understanding of market trends, product roadmap strength, innovation capacity, and strategic approach to markets and geographies. Offering (Product) Strategy is weighted high as buyers seek vendors that understand trends in business-led work management and have strong product roadmaps. In summary, Ability to Execute measures present performance while Completeness of Vision measures strategic direction and future potential.

Reference

View Leaders
View Vendor Movements